Excerpted from Public Works Financing

U.S. Water / Wastewater Contract Services Show
16% Growth to $1.7 Billion in 2000

By William Reinhardt
Editor/Publisher

PWF’s fifth annual survey of the U.S. water/wastewater outsourcing industry shows a softening in the core municipal contract operations market during calendar 2000. Moreover, relatively small gains were reported in design-build fees and industrial utility services last year, as compared to large increases for both of these market segments in 1999.

The 17 largest firms competing to sell utility operations, maintenance, design-build and asset management services in the U.S. reported outsourcing revenues of $1.68 billion in 2000, 16% higher than in 1999. That compares to revenue growth of 74% and 26% in the two previous years (see p.3).

Among the three market leaders, Operations Management International Inc. grew its business most aggressively in 2000. OMI reported a year-to-year revenue gain of 3 1.6% overall; a 22% climb in its core municipal O&M business; and a 53% jump in design-build fees as part of design-build-operate projects. Employee-owned OMI also won the 2000 Baldrige Award.

Starting from a higher revenue base, US Filter reported 14% growth overall—2.3% from municipal and 26% from design-build fees. United Water, still reorganizing, was flat overall. It did report a gain in municipal O&M revenue, largely from turnkey metering work and an expanded contract for Jersey City’s water system which it signed in January, 2000. Together, the 17 firms surveyed said they were paid over $917 million in 2000 for operating 2,273 publicly owned facilities with an aggregate design flow of over 6.9 billion gal per day. Those service fees came from 1,882 different municipal, state and federal government clients.

Another $217 million was reported by seven firms as design-build fees paid by governments part of long-term, design-build-operate (DBO) contracts. US Filter claims it won 66% of the market for new municipal DBO projects signed last year with terms of 15 years or more and involving capital and asset stewardship.

In the industrial market, 11 firms reported almost $550 million in 2000 revenue—$ 180 million of that as design-build fees. Contract operations were provided by those firms for 396 different industrial clients at 418 facilities with an aggregate design flow of 830 mgd.

These data and other information presented in the following pages are derived from detailed responses to a six-page questionnaire sent by PWF in January to the largest companies in the unregnlated contract services business. All firms responded and all responses were reviewed by PWF for consistency and reporting accuracy.

PWF’s 1999 survey data (PWF 3/00 p.1) were skewed by US Filter’s first-time reporting of its industrial O&M revenue and design-build fees, plus its inclusion of $150 million from a 622-mgd municipal O&M contract in Puerto Rico. Vivendi, US Filter’s parent, moved that low-margin contract to its Spanish subsidiary last year. PWF’s revenue and design flow data have been restated from 1996 onward to account for the shift.

Reflecting the lowered municipal base and comparatively modest gains reported by US Filter for its industrial revenues, PWF’s 2000 data set shows relatively even growth from 1999 across all market segments:

  • Government O&M, up 14% or $115 million, to $917 million;

  • Industrial O&M, up 17.5% or $55 million, to $369 million;

  • Government design-build (as part of DBO contracts), up 22% or $39 million, to $217 million;

  • Industrial design-build (as part of bundled DBO contracts), up 14%or $22 million, to $180 million in 2000.

The market share for private contract operation of municipal utility systems in the U.S. is still less
than 5% of the $35 billion spent by U.S. governments (excluding capital) for water and waste-water services. Moreover, the municipal portion of the O&M market isn’t likely to shrink noticeably until large cities opt for private contract operations and stewardship of water-cycle services, which hasn’t happened yet.

Together, the 17 firms surveyed said they were paid over $917 million in 2000 for operating 2,273 publicly owned facilities with an aggregate design flow of over 6.9 billion gal per day. Those service fees came from 1,882 different municipal, state and federal government clients.

 

 

Competitive Summary: governmental outsourcing

Competed Contracts Signed in Calendar 2000

 

Customer Project Description Firm Selected

Size ($000 Annual O&M Revenue)

 

Term (Years)

Annandale, MN W/Wwtr/PWks USF1

404

5

Athens, NY W/WwtrTP O&M USF

223

10

Atwater, CA WwtrTP O&M USF

1,123

15

Barrett Sb., TX W/WwtrTP O&M ECO

375

5

Barstow, CA W/Wwtr System O&M ECO

1,000

1

Bartlesville, OK WwtrTP+capital USF

1,5002

10

Bastrop, LA WwtrTP/Coll. USF

780

2

Beverly Hills, CA WTP DBO EarthTech 8002 20
Black River Falls, WI WwtrTP/CoII. O&M USF

200

5

Bowling Green, MO W/Wwtr/PWks Alliance

205

10

Brockton, MA W/WwtrTP O&M USF

3,750

20

Butman Twp., MI Wwtr System OBO EarthTech

300

5

Chattahoochee, AL WwtrTP O&M USF

560

5

Clermont County, OH Wtr Utilities O&M &Cust Srvcs. OMI

3,100

5+5

Clermont County, OH Wwtr Utilities EarthTech

4,000

5+5

DeKaib County, GA Land Application OMI

400

5

Elsberry, MO W/Wwtr/PWks Alliance

396

2

Floyd County, KY Wwtr System DBO USF 1,4852 20
Freeport, TX W/WwtrTP/Coll./Dist. USF

2,750

15

Fulton County, GA WwtrTP O&M OMI

3,000

10

Fulton County, GA WTP O&M USF

2,500

6

Gladewater, TX W/Wwtr/PWks USF

492

10

Gerald, MO W/Wwtr/PWks Alliance

264

3

Glens Falls, NY W/Wwtr System O&M EarthTech

2,200

20

Grattan Twp., Ml Wwtr System O&M EarthTech

200

5

Great Falls, MT WwtrTP O&M USF

1,900

5

Gretna, FL WwtrTP O&M OMI

200

5

Hardinsburg, KY W/Wwtr/PWks USF

960

5

Harrison County, MS WwtrTP O&M OPTECH/ST

1,6003

5

Jefferson Parish, LA WwtrTP O&M Azurix

2,300

5

IBWC San Diego, CA Wwtr O&M USF

2,500

10

Jackson, AL W/Wwtr O&M USF

741

10

Jersey City, NJ4 WTP O&M United Water 8,750 8
Las Campanas, NM W/Wwtr O&M OMI

300

5

Lee County, FL W/Wwtr O&M ST5 (12,000) (5)
Lowdnes County, GA W/Wwtr O&M OMI

208

7

Lynn, MA DBM CSO USF 10,0002 7
Menominee, MI W/WwtrTP O&M AIlete

600

5

Newport, RI Wwtr System DRO EarthTech

2,800

20

NJ Highway Auth, NJ W/Wwtr O&M US Water

80

3

No. Adams, MA WTP O&M US Water

222

10+5

Norwalk, CT WwtrTP O&M OMI

3,600

20

Palmetto, FL WwtrTP/Coll. USF

644

5

Pikeville, KY W/Wwtr/PWks USF

3,521

7

Plymouth, NC W/Wwtr/PWks USF

496

10

Quincy, WA WwtrTP DBO EarthTech 1,0002 20
Reidsville, NC WwtrTP O&M USWater

1,000

10

Richmond Hill, CA W/Wwtr O&M and Streets OMI

1,100

5

Rockdale County, GA WwtrTP O&M (Expansion) OMI

355

5

Seattle,WA WtrTP DBO CH2M/OMI

1,900

20

Seattle, WA WtrTP O&M Azurix/CDM

2,000

15+5+5

Springfield, MA WwtrTP O&M US Water 13,1502 20
Tampa Bay, FL WwtrtP DBO USF/CDM 7,8002 20
Taos, NM WwtrTP O&M OMI

700

8

Upper Oconee, CA WwtrTP O&M Local

750

5

Walla Walla, WA WwtrTP O&M OMI

1,400

5

Wildwood, NJ WTP O&M Azurix

3,000

20

Wilsonvile, OR WwtrTP O&M USF 1,200 5
W.elbourne, FL WwtrTP/Reuse/Coll. USF 1,050 10
Westborough, MA WwtrTP O&M USF

1,671

7

Woodbern, IN W/WwtrTP O&M ST

180

5

Wood River, IL WwtrTP O&M USF

866

5

TOTAL*:........$113,151

1 All USFilter projects are annualized amounts derived from total con tract value, incl. escalation.

2 DBO total; separate O&M revenue not provided.

3 Estimated

4 Recompeted, renewed 1/2000 for $7.97 million/year base, plus incentives.

5 ST selected but privatization was reversed (PWF 1/01 p. 10).

*Excluding Lee County FL

page3.JPG (103345 bytes)

page13.JPG (221371 bytes)
page15.JPG (156594 bytes)
page20.JPG (58436 bytes)

page21.JPG (55301 bytes)